Thursday, December 24, 2009

"Robert Altman: the oral biography" by Mitchell Zuckoff

Robert Altman: the oral biography
by Mitchell Zuckoff
Alfred A. Knopf 560 pgs.

Robert Altman will always be the patron saint of "serious" Hollywood actors. Name-above-the-title types would work for scale(1) to bathe in the fragrant pool of eau-de-genius. In reality, some folks found the experience less than ideal. To a screenwriter, Altman may have been the Antichrist. He saw a script as more of a suggestion, a jumping-off point that was a necessary evil used to lure the money changers to the table.

"When the legend becomes fact, print the legend ..." Overheard in Hollywood restaurant by someone who now works in a video store.

Altman's legend was of a shrewd guy shaping a career outside the bounds of Hollywood influence, creating largely improvised films. He made it all up as he went along, in a free-for-all collaboration between a paternal, weed-loving director and a reliable stock company of hot starlets and craggy-faced guys.

And, um, Huey Lewis's wiener.

This book doesn't contradict the idea of an almost wholly actor-centric director. But the tale told by some Altman vets (notably "Seinfeld's" chrome-domed nemesis, Bob Balaban and "Laugh In" poet, Henry Gibson)- reveals a less hagiographic take on the well-trod legend. Altman gave competent actors the freedom to add whatever they could bring to the set. Sometimes that meant doing whatever the hell you felt like and sometimes that meant keeping things closer to what was on the page.

In either case, Altman ran a pretty freewheeling enterprise. For all his anti-Hollywood stance, Altman basically partied like a rock star for most of his career, occasionally reigning things in to look good for the money men in the suits. Mercurial, moody and sometimes -inexplicably and inappropriately- mean, Altman's career is pockmarked by burned bridges and failed projects that left him scrambling for cash as his bankability oscillated wildly in the years between the career-launching "M*A*S*H" and his final work on the film version of "The Prairie Home Companion."

Somewhere in mid-career Altman helmed "Popeye", a decidedly left-field choice for a potential blockbuster film. After "Superman: The Movie" studios scrambled to jump on the comic-book movie bandwagon. Hence, someone thought a quirky, melancholy comic-strip smelled like a blockbuster. At the time, "Popeye" was whispered to be a colossal financial disaster, but it was actually a fairly successful film. Still, it was something of a personal calamity for Altman who had "troubled artist" tattooed across his head forever after. "Popeye" may be worthy of its own book. Robin Williams, in full-on spazz mode, with giant latex arms, on a sprawling set built in Malta. Malta? Only God and Robert Altman can explain why, but the most likely reason was because it was a remote island and not exactly accessible to those pesky MBA/spreadsheet guys.

Altman's failures were almost as colorful as his signature films. When Hollywood closed the door on him, he wasn't above shooting a Nixon film with a bunch of college kids enlisted in the name of some kind of wacky artist-in-residence sojourn. He took a failed off-Broadway play and shot it almost verbatim with 16mm cameras and very little money. Altman typically painted himself as a Hollywood outsider, but he rarely eschewed the yachts and high-living and was not above moves like stunt-casting Lindsay Lohan alongside Meryl Streep. Or giving his kid a crew job, and billing the studio considerably more then he paid him and pocketing the difference. Altman's diamond-to-shit ratio is pretty decent. The gems in his oeuvre are some of the most enjoyable films ever made and while the turds can be amazingly bad, they are still interesting in a W.T.F? manner.

Altman and most of his friends and family(2) cooperated in putting this book together. Which would seem to be a bit of a no-no as far as objectivity. To his grand credit, if the author pulled any punches, it's hard to imagine what was left out. It's a "warts and all" biography.

(1) "Scale" refers to the minimum pay dictated by the Screen Actor's Guild, the dominant union for proto-socialist, fellow-travelers like Tim Robbins (and his ilk.) As of this writing that means about $1000-$4000 usd per week. Which ain't exactly chicken feed. By comparison, a union carpenter can make $700-$1000 usd per week, depending where he is located.

(2) Conspicuously absent is Faye Dunaway. Who -it is strongly hinted- had an affair with the director that almost trashed his marriage.

Friday, December 18, 2009

Saturday, December 5, 2009

W.T.F. Dylan?

Bob Dylan has apparently gone stark-raving-mad and it is a joy to behold.

"Christmas in the Heart" -Dylan's 47th album- is a raggedy collection of Zimmy singing corny, old-favorite, holiday songs delivered with nary a hint of irony and rasped out in his deliciously, shredded voice.

And it is awesome. This is the most unexpected holiday treat since Bing Crosby answered the doorbell and invited David Bowie in for the still-inexplicable-to-this-day "Little Drummer Boy" duet.



The highlight of "Christmas from the Heart" is a raucous take on "Must Be Santa" that sounds like it would be right at home on a Pogues record. It's a mindbending Klezmer/jug-band party stomper. (See the video here. Embedding disabled)

This is probably the most left-field thing Dylan has done since his alleged embrace of Christianity resulted in the underrated "Slow Train Coming." Dylan deflates that entire brush-with-Jesus episode (and more) in the entertaining and enjoyable "Chronicles: Volume One."

Likewise, if you watch Scorcese's documentary "No Direction Home" the "Minnesota Man of Mystery" persona that has followed Dylan since time began, seems less like the master plan of a self-promoting folkie, then the result of overzealous fans and overreaching journalists. In the film, he scoffs at most of the absurd assumptions made about his intentions over the years. Maybe it's another mysterious "persona" on display, but if so, it's cynical and smart and coming from a guy who apparently knows how to laugh, while rolling around the bed with this crazy mistress we call fame and fortune.

In other Dylan news: in a recent interview with the British Classic Rock(1) magazine, KISS fire-breather, Gene $immons, claims that Dylan's wacky greasepaint get-up during the "Rolling Thunder Revue" was directly inspired by KISS (see photo above.) Like Gene says; 'If you don't believe me, you can ask him yourself.'

Yeah, dude. Like, I got him on speed-dial.

Sounds plausible anyway. Who are we to argue with the Bat-Lizard?

(1)
The interview doesn't seem to be online. I read it for free in Barnes and Noble (which is kind of like the Internet; lots of free stuff to read and no obligation to buy anything.) Anyway, it's a good magazine if you are interested in whatever happened to Starz or need to fill in the holes of your knowledge of Thin Lizzy. Or maybe you wonder when that Trigger album is being reissued. That little tidbit is filed under "Best News of the Century!"

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Why You Should Continue To Steal Major Label Music From The Interweb

Too Much Joy is a band from Scarsdale, New York that have been around since the 80s and are still occasionally active today. They were ubiquitous at various NY/NJ clubs back in the day, but probably suffered a bit commercially by being hard to categorize; a bit too gritty for the power-pop crowd and a bit too poppy for the glory days of alt/grunge/whatevs. They were a good rock and roll band, a commodity that is hard to market. I was a big fan of their Warner Bros. album "Mutiny" which featured an inexplicable cover of the Records' "Starry Eyes" and a tempered sense of humor that made you smile without seeming too jokey.

As we all dance around the bonfire that engulfs the burning skeleton of the big time music business it's easy to forget that large sums of money still flow into buildings shaped like records and into the pockets of large corporations like Warners, Sony et al.

And while a certain percentage of that money may make it into the gilded pockets of a hand full of high-profile artists, most mid-level, orphaned bands we all know and love, never see a penny. And they are usually (technically speaking) in debt to the tune of (no pun intended) millions of dollars.

Big-time media royalty accounting is the stuff of legend.(1) Most musicians know that music royalties are not going to pay the bills anymore. This is the reason that so many artists -folks who previously put a lot of effort into releasing new music- have turned to churning out cover records (Bob Dylan, Hatebreed, Matthew Sweet etc.) They've just given up making new music. The real money is in "publishing" and that income goes directly to the songwriter, NOT the performer like a lot of people assume. Songwriting royalties are automatic and compulsory (roughly 7 cents per song, per record sold, more or less.) What you get for actually recording those tunes is subject to the whims of the record companies.

These days, it's all about merch and touring and it's getting harder to make a buck. For a bunch of guys setting out in a van, a slight uptick in gas prices might make the difference between profitability and coming home broke.

But -as Too Much Joy's Tim Quirk documents here- it's still a bizarre and complicated business. The new "revenue models" for artists and musicians are still in the experimental stages at best. Sure there will always be someone, somehow raking in music-derived money from big corporations, but for tons of mid-level "baby bands", it's an open question.

(1)Sketchy financial practices are not limited to screwing over hippies and punk rockers. For a look at how Hollywood uses "creative accounting" click here to read about Art Buchwald's legendary problems with Paramount over "Coming to America."