I Watches the Watchmen

• Yeah, it's good. Real good.

For nerds only? Maybe, a bit. A lot of what makes "Watchmen" great is built on the expectations and familiar tropes of the genre. You expect action and razzle-dazzle and plenty of that is on display here. But you also get middle-age crisis, erectile-dysfunctioning caped crusaders and um, rape.

• The ending is a bit dumbed - but not in the way we have been led to believe.

The much ballyhooed loss of a giant squid destroying New York City has been harpooned in favor of a grimmer, more conventional denouement involving some random nukes. That's a pretty arbitrary move but it's not as distracting as what follows: a tacked-on montage of the city apparently rebuilding as two of the leads make some rah-rah voiceover speech about continuing their superhero mission. It's obvious, awkward fodder for a possible sequel. Don't act so surprised. But if you thought Alan Moore was pissed about this movie being made at all, wait until he gets wind of a sequel.

• It's also very long. But it's never boring.

Face it, everything is too long. Especially when you take "can't-touch-this" material and give it to a hot director who knows how to read the fanboy tea leaves. And the DVD will be even longer. An intermission would have been nice but what-the-heck. You gets your moneys worth. Lots of bits and pieces from the book are missing - even at close to three hours - and the DVD release is going to be almost as hotly debated an event as the theatrical launch.

• It's surprisingly, satisfyingly violent.

Arguments can be made that the "Watchmen" is an anti-violence screed, showing the futility of war - blah blah blah. And that the heaps of violence in the film contradict that a bit. I'm not buying it. But the film is quite a bit more explicitly violent than the book.

Those clever fucks at the AVClub.com have published this nice book-to-movie comparison.